Capture the Flag
U.S. v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310, 319 (1990).If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable. Punishing desecration of the flag dilutes the very freedom that makes this emblem so revered, and worth revering.
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 419 (1989).The way to preserve the flag's special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters. It is to persuade them that they are wrong. To courageous, self-reliant men, with confidence in the power of free and fearless reasoning applied through the processes of popular government, no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present, unless the incidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion. If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.
And, precisely because it is our flag that is involved, one's response to the flag burner may exploit the uniquely persuasive power of the flag itself. We can imagine no more appropriate response to burning a flag than waving one's own, no better way to counter a flag burner's message than by saluting the flag that burns, no surer means of preserving the dignity even of the flag that burned than by--as one witness here did--according its remains a respectful burial. We do not consecrate the flag by punishing its desecration, for in doing so we dilute the freedom that this cherished emblem represents.
It never ceases to amaze me how easily the loftiest and most important constitutional principles in this country are sacrificied by the very people we elect to uphold them for the greater good.
Sadly, as George Will once said, "American politics as you know . . . is very often a matter of capture the flag."

5 Comments:
Another canadian common in law life long partner Resource... LifeLaw.org . A discussion forum for all that deals with such hot-button issues as canadian common in law life long partner .
Sad to say I just got back from a bowling tournament and decided to log in and do some websurfing. The Accipiter I love your blog. I had some very good laughs. I am doing a paper on collection of umbilical cord blood and have been downloading information for the last hour. I don’t know how I came across this post but I am glad I did. It has set me back a little because I have spent the last hour reading your archives. If you don’t mind I would like to add you to my favorites so I can back again and read some more. Well I need to get back to collection of umbilical cord blood. I am almost finished with it. Great job.
p.s some very good points on your blog
Hi The Accipiter your blog is really great! Wow :-) As I was out blog surfing and surfing the web for detailed info on cord blood stem cell banks I stumbled across your blog. Obviously my search landed me here and it is a little off subject compared to this post, but I am certainly glad I did come across your blog. Did I already tell you I like it! If you would not mind, I would like to add your link to my "favorites" page to come back and read again sometime. Should you ever need it, there's lots of information on this site about cord blood stem cell banks. Again, great blog and keep up the great work!
I didnt find thing that i need... :-(
yahoo
Buy levitra online
http://mtsu32.mtsu.edu:11263/_disc2/00000193.htm#cialis
Post a Comment
<< Home